49ers sign DT Glenn Dorsey

The 49ers have signed defensive tackle Glenn Dorsey to a two-year deal, the team just announced.

Here’s what general manager Trent Baalke said about the signing: “We are very pleased to add Glenn to our team. Glenn brings great versatility to our defensive front, and we look forward to his contributions on the field and in the community.”

The Chiefs drafted Dorsey with the fifth pick in the 2008 draft, and for the first five seasons of his career he’s been a bust. The Chiefs played him at defensive end in a three-man front. He played well against the run at times, but he was a non-factor against the pass, which means he’s probably a better fit at nose tackle.

The 49ers need a nose tackle. They lost one this offseason – Isaac Sopoaga – and they could lose another one – Ricky Jean Francois. Dorsey has a chance to become the 49ers’ starting nose tackle in the base defense. In the sub packages, Dorsey could be the main backup for Justin Smith and Ray McDonald at the three-technique defensive tackle position.

 

This entry was posted in Inside the 49ers and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

209 Responses to 49ers sign DT Glenn Dorsey

  1. Ralph says:

    I’m dashon goldson goes to the buccaneers he will be missed when the NinerS go CHEAP!

    • BigP says:

      Big hitter that benefited from the Niners front seven. I like the Hawk, but coverage skills are so important in today’s NFL. I wish him the best of luck and can’t fault him for cashing in. I can’t fault the Niners front office for not overpaying either.

      • Msclemons67 says:

        Exactly. Hawk was one of my favorite players but there’s just no way he’s an $8 million player.

    • MikeinSF#2 says:

      He got more money than the Weddle deal. I would happily save that big salary for Aldon, Iupait, A. Davis, Kaep, Crab and others that will roll in the next 1-2 years.

      • MidWestNiner says:

        I think the Harvin and Wallace deals will price Crabtree out of San Francisco at the end of next season.

      • Allan says:

        Not if they stink in Miami and Seattle.

        Then the market will be reluctant in paying so much for FA WRs.

      • MidWestNiner says:

        There will always be a team willing to spend that much however. The Jets come to mind for example.

      • niners says:

        I feel like Baalke will be smart enough to extend Crab or Kaep this year depending on how they play.

      • MidWestNiner says:

        Kaep is the only one I’m positive will get an extension. I wouldn’t be surprised if Crabtree waits until the end of the season for anything dealing with contract talks.

      • oneniner says:

        We sign Reed and we exchange a big hitter for a big int player…..

      • Mr. Everything says:

        MWN

        I’m really trying here, bud. We have Crab for 2 more years. Thanks.

      • MontanaMan16 says:

        A rookie contract cant be extended until after its 3rd year so this next season will have to end before Kap can be extended, not during the year. Just saying!

    • rocket says:

      You can’t pay everybody. That’s just the way it is.

      • KezarMike says:

        Rocket is exactly right. One reason the NFL is mre competitive than I have ever seen it since I started following the 49ers in 1967. QB and offensive lineman you pay first (if they are real good ones). Then stars like Aldon, Willis, Bowman. Receivers are last. You don’t spend your money on just a good safety like Goldson. That’s why Crabs will probably be gone. So … that’s probably the reason for the Jenkins pick, and that means the 49ers need to start getting some more receivers but that ain’t where a contending team wants to spend its money when it needs it for other more key players.

      • Wilson says:

        The teams that will have the most flexibility are those who draft well. The 49ers are probably the best team in the NFL capwise because they have a bargain-salaried quarterback for a while, and no other outrageous contracts. Seattle is in a similar situation except that they just signed a huge contract to Percy Harvin, which gives them less flexibility. So you hope for another huge haul in the draft – like 2011 and not, please God, 2012. That way you dump high priced veterans and replace them with low-cost draftees who are as good or close.

    • Folsom49er says:

      “I’m dashon goldson goes to the buccaneers”?

      HUH?

      I ARE FOOTBALL HEAD

  2. MidWestNiner says:

    Good move if they signed him on the cheap.

    • BigBrad184 says:

      Agree. Hopefully they didn’t commit too much to him. I’m intrigued to see what role he takes on with the team. Hopefully Tomsula taps into that potential he had coming out of LSU.

  3. MidWestNiner says:

    The new pole question should ask what we think of the Dorsey signing.

  4. Tom says:

    There’s a difference between “going cheap” and overpaying like the Bucs. The 49ers had practically zero chance to match that offer, and then be able to extend guys like Iupati, A. Davis, Crabtree, A. Smith and Kaepernick in the near future.

  5. Alan M says:

    If it’s not much money, I like this deal. He’s bigger than RJF, isn’t he?

  6. tkamB says:

    Well if he plays nose its almost guaranteed hes an upgrade from Sopoaga considering how bad Sop was last year. I thought Ian Williams was suppose to fill that spot though?

  7. hova says:

    I dont really like hes not a nose tackle he replaces rjf if anything gotta get a nose tackle in the.draft

    • MikeinSF#2 says:

      He is the first FA we had visit. The FO obviously thinks very highly of him and has a plan for him. Let this one play out. Could be a pleasant surprise.

      • fesnyc says:

        like your thinking Mike – Dorsey had a lot of eyes on him, so Baalke must have seen something he liked to make him an early move in the FA period. it’s relying on faith, but i like this signing.

  8. Spaceborn says:

    Wow, did not expect this to happen! But trying to out-guess Baalke is never easy. I just hope it is a cap-friendly deal.

  9. Brotha Tuna says:

    Is bust the right word? Certainly the fifth overall should be able to dominate so etimes and impress most of the time. Inarguably Dorsey has not lived up to that but if ‘he’s played well against the run’ as consensus opinion supports then he’s an overpaid underachiever. In my mind ‘Bust’ is something worse than that. I realize it’s subjective.
    Can Dorsey be a successful resurrection project? The FO seems to think so. In college he played inside and was productive even against double teams. He got penetration back then so he might fit the 1gap.

  10. MidWestNiner says:

    I am wondering if there will be some cuts soon by the Niners.

    • Mr. Everything says:

      This is an astute consideration, MWN.

      • MidWestNiner says:

        Thanks.

      • Mr. Everything says:

        MWN
        I’m trying to chill out, per the CFC convo. Sorry for going Baccari Rambo on you earlier.

      • MidWestNiner says:

        No problem. It was my fault as well. Any thoughts on who could get cut?

      • Mr. Everything says:

        MWN

        Cuts will not happen now, because there is no reason to expedite the process if the Niners aren’t spending. We’ll find out how much the Dorsey contract costs, and in the next few days , we’ll learn that Baalke is the same old Baalke.

        That said, there are only a few worthwhile ($$$-wise) candidates remaining to cut.

        I think a lot has been made of need at OLB, but the Niners drafted 2 guys last season (Johnson and Fleming), who are 22 & 23 respectively, and cost a total if ~$800K. So Harylson ($3M) will be cut, or possibly traded prior to draft day.

        Looney and Kilgore appear to be young and capable, so Goodwin is a candidate too ($5M), but I don’t see them releasing him, as he was still a top-5 center last season, and the OL came together so well with many of the young guys crediting Goodwin’s quiet leadership.

        Manningham ($5M) is gone. Kyle Williams is quicker, younger, and cheaper than Manningham, and the latter’s injury was much more severe. The Niners now have Crab, Boldin, Williams, AJJ, Manningham, and the two promising PS players under contract. They’ll likely draft another WR in the draft this year, and Manningham is simply too expensive.

        The last candidate for being cut is Whitner ($5M), and I just don’t see this happening. A lot of people complain about his height and lack of coverage skills (ahem, Grant Cohn), but it is clear that Whitner, and NOT Goldson, has been the spiritual and cerebral heart of the Niners secondary over the last two years. I could be wrong about this, obviously, but I just don’t see the Niners drafting 2 safeties in 2013.

        What’s your take?

      • MidWestNiner says:

        The candidates I believe that could be cut before the season begins are Goodwin, Manningham, Whitner, Haralson, Dixon, K. Williams, Kilgore, and/or Cox. Here are my reasons why:

        Goodwin- Though he has been successful at C since
        his signing, Goodwin is 34 and in the last
        year of his contract. The team may want
        to see what they have in Kilgore or Looney
        at this position and if they feel confident
        in either then Goodwin will most likely be
        released, saving the team $5.016 million.

        Manningham- Manningham is coming back from
        injury and could find out that he isn’t
        even the third best WR on the depth
        chart if Jenkins greatly improves or
        the team drafts a WR in one of the
        first three rounds. The Niners will
        not keep him if either or both
        scenarios happens, saving $4.95
        million in cap space.

        Whitner- Whitner went from the talk of the town in a
        good way to the main topic in a bad way.
        Though he can deliver crushing blows, his
        coverage skills below average for a SS. If
        (as most fans suspect) the team finds a
        better option in FA or the draft, then his
        time in the red and gold will be cut short
        and save the team $4.93 million.

        Haralson- His only crime is losing his starting job to
        a gifted OLB in Smith, but Haralson is
        being paid like a starter and that could be
        his undoing as a Niner. He is an
        excellent backup but his $2.87 million
        salary could be used elsewhere.

        Dixon- Dixon seems to have this problem every
        season in that he needs to prove that he is
        worthy of a roster spot. If the team does
        indeed draft a RB or find someone more
        capable than him on ST, then his final chance
        will probably run out and save the team
        $660,000 in cap space.

        K. Williams- Injuries could be K. Williams’ undoing
        as he has struggled to stay healthy his
        entire career. The team is expected to
        acquire one or two WRs and address
        the PR position this off-season. Doing
        so will have K. Williams most likely
        getting cut and giving the Niners a
        savings of $649,839.

        Kilgore- The team drafted Kilgore to be the eventual
        starting C for the offense. The problem is
        that they drafted Looney last year for the
        same exact reason. If Looney can pass
        Kilgore on the C depth chart then his only
        hope is as a backup G. However, he has not
        done well in that role when utilized there
        and the possibility of him being bypassed
        by a draft pick is very likely. Both need to
        happen for him to be cut and save the team
        from paying him $595,075, but the chances
        of both happening at the same time are
        actually very high.

        Cox- Simply put, if the team signs or drafts a CB(s)
        then Cox will most likely be cut and give the
        team an extra $555,000 in cap space.

        Of these candidates, I think Goodwin, Manningham, Whitner, K. Williams, Kilgore, and Cox are the ones who could get cut. The savings from these cuts could
        range from $555,000 to $15.3 million if all seven players were cut.

    • Spaceborn says:

      Well, they could cut Parys Haralson and save 2.5 million even if they still have to pay his $100,000 bonus. No dead money.

      • MidWestNiner says:

        Another candidate is Goodwin if the team believes that either Kilgore or Looney is ready to assume the starting C role.

  11. Allan says:

    Many KC fans wishing him well on PFT and saying he will flourish if used correctly.

    Maybe this signing can be better than previously thought.
    specially if the money is not much.

    I agree he might be a good fit as NT in base defense and DT on passing down when we run a 4-3 front seven.

    • George says:

      Some of the quotes:

      As a Chiefs fan – Good Luck! You will flourish if used correctly – Another Pioli disaster in the wrong system.

      As another Chiefs fan – I hope he goes to SF and beasts it. He was miscast here and had hideous coaching.

      The niners switch to a 4-3 at times so he could work much better in that scheme.

  12. Swansong says:

    3-4 doesn’t work unless you have a big NT with power. Dorsey is basically the same size and height as RJF. He has underachieved at DE, now 49ers want him to overachieve as THE NT in a 3-4. I think this is a HUGE mistake.
    Keepin’ my fingers crossed.

    • BigP says:

      Most people thought the Niners overpaid for Justin Smith when he arrived here as a free agent. They used his low sack numbers to aid their argument, but didn’t see the impact he made on the defense as a whole. He has never had more than 8.5 sacks in a season, but he has been the most important player on the field. Baalke has done a tremendous job adding players to this roster, yet every year people question the front office during the free agency period. Flash doesn’t equal success. Remember Nate Clements?

      • Grant Cohn says:

        Forget 8.5, Dorsey has never had more than two sacks in a season.

      • BigP says:

        Grant,
        I know that. He is a very talented player that will benefit from a good coaching staff. These guys wanted him for that exact reason. Baalke is considered one of, if not the best G.M. in the game. Why is that?

      • rocket says:

        They targeted Dorsey on day one and signed him on day two. That tells me they see something in this guy and feel they can turn him into a solid player. That’s all I need to know.

      • Brotha Tuna says:

        @Rocket. Good point on Baalke’s time line on Dorsey; it was pretty forthright and fast by his usual standards.
        @Big P
        Not to put words in his mouth, but I’m not convinced Grant agrees on Trent’s rep/stature as a GM. I do.

      • EB Niner says:

        BigP, I am not sure Baalke is or should be considered the best GM in the game. He’s not exactly been around long enough to attain that status and many of the guys w/the Niners now were not Baalke choices.

        Scot McCloughan was responsible for many of the guys and in case you hadn’t noticed, there wasn’t much production from last years draft. In fact, no actual production outside of LMJ.

        He’s good, but we need more track record. If Dorsey turns out to be an all pro with us, then great, but let’s keep the crowns off to the side until we see the “football Life” story for Baalke 15 years from now.

      • BigP says:

        EB Niner,
        First draft:
        Mike Iupati, Anthony Davis, Navarro Bowman, Kyle Williams

        Second draft:
        Aldon Smith, Colin Kaepernick, Chris Culliver, Kendall Hunter, Bruce Miller

        Third draft:
        A.J. Jenkins (who was sought after by quite a few teams), LaMichael James, Joe Looney (possible future starter), Trenton Robinson, Cam Johnson (who was projected to go much earlier in the draft)

        He has done a fantastic job. People complain about last years draft while completely ignoring the fact that there were virtually no open positions. They selected players for the future at great value and accrued a ton of draft picks. Those picks give them tremendous flexibility in the draft and free agency. That is exactly how good teams stay at the top. Now that they have some needs, they have the ammunition to take care of them. Many people were clamoring for the team to move up and get Coby Fleener last year, almost guaranteeing stardom for him. What did he do? Virtually nothing, while being outperformed by the TE the Colts selected in the third round. What position would the team be in had they traded a bunch of picks to trade up for a player that didn’t do anything and wasn’t at a position of need? Sometimes the moves that G.M.’s don’t make are the reason they are so good.

      • Jack Hammer says:

        BigP,

        You can add Ian Williams to that 2nd year as an undrafted free agent pickup.

        All good points. When Baalke needed immediate impact guys he got them.

      • BigP says:

        Jack,
        Williams is another fine pickup, good point. It just drives me up the wall when people rip last years draft without even looking at the big picture. The team was set. Baalke did a great job in getting more picks while adding players for the future. Maybe we are just such hard core football geeks that we understand the process a bit more. I’m a big fan of Baalke and the direction he has this franchise headed. Like you have said many times, the fact that they have been to the NFC Championship game and the Super Bowl in the last two seasons speaks for itself.

      • exgolfer says:

        If anyone has done a better job at GM than Baalke in the last two years, I would like to hear who that might be.

        He’s been the class of the league.

        The Smith, Kaepernick, Culliver, Hunter and Miller draft may go down as one of the best drafts in NFL history. It may sound like it, but I don’t think that’s hyperbole.

        And the 49ers are loaded with draft picks this year, are poised to load up with draft picks in 2014, while still adding needed players in this year’s draft.

        The 49ers are out Patrioting the Patriots.

      • rocket says:

        Agree completely on Baalke, the man has had an incredible start to being a gm and has this team deep in talent with a boatload of picks to add more. Not just this year either; they are well on their way to having a similar cache of picks in 2014.
        This team is now one of the best run organizations top to bottom in the league.

      • EB Niner says:

        My point was essentially that he’s had a pretty good run, but not ALL of the Niners current success is due to him and time will tell how good he really is.

    • MikeinSF#2 says:

      Can we all acknowledge the 49ers ran their 4 man front +65% of the time last year

  13. Jack Hammer says:

    Love this pickup, especially in light of Scooters post on the live blog. Couldn’t care less about the $$ part of it.

    • Crab15 says:

      ▲▲▲ All arrows up on Dorsey! ▲▲▲
      Fangio will use this dude properly.

    • Mr. Everything says:

      Jack

      You gonna parrot my posts from a month ago advocating this signing?

      • Crab15 says:

        Hammer – Remember Gilbert Brown (Packers dominating NT in mid/late 90′s)? He was 6-2 340 and Dorsey is 6-1 300. Fangio should dig up some old film on Gilbert Brown and show Dorsey how you do it. Remember Gilbert’s gravedigger dance after sack or tackle for loss? He killed Niners in playoffs, we couldn’t block him.
        Dorsey should hang at a Golden Corral 3 times a week, get up to 330-340 and clog the middle of the field.

      • Mr. Everything says:

        Crab
        No Niner should be all Jabba like Gil Brown was. One thing the Niners have above and beyond every other NFL team is a ridic training program. You don’t want to see MOOB spilling out from under the new Nike unis.

  14. Jai says:

    I don’t know about Dorsey. I know he definitely has not lived up to expectations. Somebody who knows the Chiefs, told me the problem was a combo of bad coaching and schemes. Sounds like excuses to me. All I know is, he got handled by the the Raiders porous OL last season. That’s definitely not good

  15. Scooter_McG says:

    Where is the line of thought that Dorsey will be used at NT coming from? Is that speculation or has there been some reports somewhere that the 49ers intend to use him at NT?

    I see him as being used in the DE rotation in the 3-4 front and moving inside in the 4-man front. He may get some snaps at NT as the swing man in the RJF mold, backing up all 3 DL positions.

    • rocket says:

      Strictly speculation from Grant and a couple of others Scooter. I’m with you; I think Dorsey is used the same way RJF was.

    • Spaceborn says:

      Scooter, that would make the most sense. I really thought he would return to the Chiefs because new defensive coordinator Bob Sutton plans on running a hybrid 3/4-4/3 where Dorsey could be used pretty much the same way.

  16. rocket says:

    Dorsey can be viewed in the same context as Alex Smith imo: players taken very high who didn’t meet expectations, but who have quietly had better production than has been acknowledged.

    Dorsey and RJF played side by side and Dorsey was the far superior prospect. He didn’t pan out in KC the way they wanted him too, but PFF detailed his play over the 2010/11 seasons as pretty good. He made a lot of tackles for a 3-4 DE and held up well against the run. He has not developed as a passrusher, but he has a lot of ability to work with and if anybody can get it out of him I’m betting it’s Tomsula.

    • Jai says:

      Woah…no way. Dorsey wasn’t anywhere near as bad as Alex was pre Harbaugh. If that were true, he would not have even got an invite.

      • MidWestNiner says:

        In other words Dorsey just needs the right coaching Jai.

      • rocket says:

        Viewed in the same context is what I said Jai. They are obviously not exactly the same as far as their history, and Smith was hurt for a large part of the middle of his career. They both underachieved based on where they were taken, but have put up solid numbers the past few years.

      • mike says:

        Ppl have came down on a.smith too hard,i thnk he was a product of bad players around him,not to mention a half dozen off.cordinaters,we didnt get to c his full potentiol,we only got a glimpse of it the last 2yrs. he was there

  17. MikeinSF#2 says:

    Eric Branch ‏@Eric_Branch
    Spoke to Louisiana-based draft man, Mike Detillier, who saw all Glenn Dorsey’s home games at LSU. Much better “fit” inside w/ #49ers, he sez

  18. Steelematic says:

    Well i like dorsey.. hes younger and stronger. Another high draft pick with a chip on his shoulder on our squad. 3 sacks 50 tackes this year

  19. Big niner says:

    Dorsey on a weak D Line will not flourish. With our front 7 and the players next to him, he’ll be a beast!! you heard it here first. His push up the middle will require double teams. What happens to JS and RM’s games with the double team of a guy like that? what if they double JS only, frees up AS and Dorsey….scary if you ask me.
    He was not used right in KC. Bad team, bad organization, bad timing for him. To stop the read option/pistol offense, you need push up the middle. This signing was strictly for the seachickens.
    Good move Harbaalke!!!

  20. Pete says:

    Gabe Wilkins 2.0 but for less money.

    • Big niner says:

      lol, you had to go there.

    • EB Niner says:

      He’s not coming in injured like Gabe did. I’m not sure how Gabe passed the physical, but…please don’t jinx it like that! Besides, we don’t over pay for people like they did for Gabe.

  21. MikeinSF#2 says:

    Those commenting on the 3-4 vs. 4-3 remember this – We are a multiple scheme and…….:

    I remember when universal opinion was that Justin Smith, Patrick Willis, Novarrow Bowman, Ray McDonald and Aldon Smith were all supposed to be 4-3 defensive scheme guys and totally miscast in a 3-4. Now they just have +10 all pros and pro bowl births between them.

    • Big niner says:

      Fangio rarely goes 4 down lineman unless he’s in the dime package.

      • MikeinSF#2 says:

        If by “Rarely” you mean +65% of our total defensive snaps last year, then yes. We run our 4-man front more than any other front.

      • Big niner says:

        Where did you get that stat from? We’re a 3-4 team not a 4-3. Who are the 4 down lineman you’re referring too? RM, IS and JS….

      • old coach says:

        Big Niner our 4 down linemen were DE A. Smith and A. Brooks at DT J. Smith and R. Mc Donald

      • Brotha Tuna says:

        BigNiner
        I think he’s referring to when we pull the NT, move the ends inside and have Aldon and Brooks go to 3 point stance as ends; it becomes a four man line.

      • Big niner says:

        Ok, how often was that the case? I don’t remember AS in a 3 point stance that often. That’s what a 4-3 front is. If AS standing up, then it’s a 3-4 still.

      • Brotha Tuna says:

        Agree with your definition. I can not answer what the actual percentage is. Maybe those here who watch more tape than I do could answer that.

      • old coach says:

        Big Niner he was in a 3 pt stance everytime we were in a 4 man line. Sopoaga and RJF lined up at NT approx 35% of the time other than that we were 4-3 with Smiths hand on the ground. Anyone else out there think that or am i crazy?

      • Big niner says:

        Brotha,
        I understand that but how often were we in that front? I remember in dime situations or big nickel sometimes. Those situations are usually on 3rd and long which would be 1/3 of the time or less not mentioning the actual converting of 1st downs on the second play of each 4 down opportunity.
        So basically That formation is used to for 3rd and long and the occasional 4th and long play. The stat should be % 35 or less not %65. That was my point. Our defense is in the base formation most of the time. That’s what diferentiates our defense from other teams and is also a reason why our guys got so worn down towards the end of the year….

      • Brotha Tuna says:

        I hear you. I wasn’t the one who came up with the 65%. My impression was that Aldon was up on the earlier downs in either 3 or 4 fronts, like 2-6. But on 2-9/10 and 3/long he was down. Not scientific.
        I bet all the OCs in our division have that break-out!

      • Brotha Tuna says:

        Another consideration is that whether he’s in a two or three point stance, his responsibilities are different when they run a 4front scheme vs a 3front scheme.

      • Jack Hammer says:

        Big Niner,

        It’s fairly simple. Chris Culliver, the Nickle/Dime corner played approximately 65% of the snaps last year, and conversely the defense played with a NT (3-4) approximately 35% of the snaps last year.

        While the D’s base is a 3-4 they spend far more time in their sub packages.

      • Grimey9er says:

        The nickel package is technically 2-4-5 personnel wise but 4-2-5 formation wise.

  22. Crab15 says:

    If Welker signs elsewhere, Pat’s want to replace Welker with Amendola. Why does a small white guy always have to replace a small white guy?

  23. George says:

    Here’s the nfl.com profile for Glenn Dorsey when he was coming out:
    http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/glenn-dorsey?id=218

  24. A$AP Classic says:

    I think they’ll use him on base downs instead of J Smith. Probably 30 to 40% of the time. That would help the Cowboy be more effective of passing downs.

  25. George says:

    Re Landry, here’s something I just read in an article:
    Landry’s agent, Joel Segal, also represents former Chiefs defensive lineman Glenn Dorsey, who is visiting the 49ers today.

  26. George says:

    Now bring on John Abraham.

  27. runman49 says:

    From my friend a huge Chiefs fan…”Dorsey is my favorite player. KC screwed him. He’s the most explosive DT I have ever seen out of college. Scott Pioli came in, insisted on a 3/4 and forced him out of position. He never complained. Had they used him as a 3 technique rather than an outside 5 technique, he’d be a Pro Bowler as we speak. I knew he would be the steal of Free Agency. I’m happy for him. He’s not a true NT. He will be an explosive penetrator inside on a 4 man line. …, if SF insists on a 3/4, he’s still a decent DE. KC never tried him at NT. They wanted a guy 325 or up. Dorsey is around 300.”

  28. BigP says:

    From PFT:

    New Eagles defensive tackle Isaac Sopoaga, freshly arrived from San Francisco, went all in during his introductory press conference. “I believe and I promise that we are going to shock the world,” Sopoaga said, via Jordan Raanan of NJ.com.

    SMH….

  29. Razoreater says:

    Your move Stinky Pete……

  30. George says:

    PFT says four teams now interested in Nnamdi:
    49ers, Broncos, Cardinals, and Texans

  31. MidWestNiner says:

    Wes Welker has agreed to a two year deal with the Broncos. That offense is going to be tough to defend against.

  32. George says:

    Sando will be posting on Dorsey “in a bit.”
    http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcwest

  33. Big niner says:

    manning still can’t play in the cold

  34. old coach says:

    (ers sign Ian Williams then Sign G. Dorsey. Harbaugh loves competion at every position. It will make them both better.

  35. ATL_49er says:

    FS Kerry Rhodes was just released by the Cardinals, may be a good fit in SF.

    http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/3316/kerry-rhodes

  36. tkamB says:

    Cribbs to AZ

  37. Dan says:

    Super move, HarBaalke!!!

    McDonald-Dorsey-Justin Smith
    Brooks-Willis-Bowman-Aldon Smith*

    As for pass rushing team, Aldon Smith moves to Justin’s spot and Justin moves to Dorsey’s spot. Parys Haralson can handle the team rush defense as well

  38. Brotha Tuna says:

    Ravens cut Bernard Pollard. FO will already be familiar with him.

  39. oneniner says:

    Good Sign…..I Like

  40. oneniner says:

    Goldson signed…..with bucs

  41. MidWestNiner says:

    Does anybody know the required benchmarks Crabtree needs to meet in order for him to be able to void the sixth and final year of his rookie contract?

    • oneniner says:

      The contract can void to five years based on Pro Bowl and playing time triggers.

      Playing time looks good…..Pro bowl app not good.

    • Mr. Everything says:

      MWN

      Technically unattainable at this point. Crabtree will be a Niner through 2014.

      “The source tells us that, in his first four seasons (including 2009), Crabtree must either qualify for two Pro Bowls, or he must qualify for one Pro Bowl in one year and he must participate in 80 percent of the offensive snaps in a separate year in which the team makes the playoffs.” – PFT, 10/7/09, Rosenthal

      See also: http://www.ninersnation.com/2012/11/28/3703096/michael-crabtree-contract-2012-nfl-pro-bowl-free-agent

      Thus far, Crab has not made a ProBowl, so he cannot qualify for his option.

      • MidWestNiner says:

        That was my main concern so it’s good to know. Maybe the team can extend him after all.

  42. ninermd says:

    My dream scenario would be Rhodes and Nnamdi I think with those two were back to elite. IIIFFF J Smith stays healthy.
    Draft D Linemen a safety and a recover with speed and hands. Yes in that order.

    • tkamB says:

      Nnamdi was pretty terrible last year, I really don’t think he’d be much of an upgrades over Rogers/Brown/Culliver.

  43. George says:

    Here’s a PFT article about there apparently being little interest in Cliff Avril, which would have been a surprise a month ago:
    http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/03/13/no-news-is-bad-news-for-cliff-avril/

    One of the points the article makes:
    “One problem for Avril is that there’s a glut of defensive ends on the market: Teams don’t think they need to go hog wild for Avril when Michael Bennett, Osi Umenyiora, Dwight Freeney, John Abraham, Israel Idonije, Matt Shaughnessy and Lawrence Jackson are available, not to mention the fact that Elvis Dumervil is expected to get cut by the Broncos this week. If a defensive end is what you’re looking for, there are a lot of choices available.”

    This is good for us, of course. My guess is, though, there are other things going on. If some of these are not correct, some of them certainly are:
    1. The cap is rising only modestly. That’s a definite.
    2. A bad economy makes it harder to raise ticket prices and parking lot fees. That the economy is bad is certain, but whether it prevents clubs from raising prices is not a given. Maybe it’s better to say that the sky is not the limit on prices.
    3. There are a lot of “bad” contracts that are choking clubs. This is probably true.
    4. More teams are realizing that it’s better not to participate in a buying frenzy. This is the most interesting proposition, I believe. If so, the owners are finally getting smarter and it might make it easier for us to keep players.

  44. Razoreater says:

    Honey Badger wants to play for the 49ers….is Baalke going to have to draft this kid at 34? Or can they get him at 61? Early 3rd looks to be out of the question. If I’m a scout in the war room, I’m banging the table for this kid.

  45. AES says:

    There has not been many players in KC who have prospered over the past 7-10 years. Charles, Bowe, and Tamba Hali have had some success but never sustainable over time. Yet, the Chiefs have drafted high with little to show for it.

    At some point the Org has to question the coaching personnel because their high draft picks have produced very little return.

    In any case, I’m hoping that Dorsey was a casualty of bad coaching and that his game will elevate with our brand of coaching.

  46. Mr. Everything says:

    Seachickens get Cliff Avril from Detroit.

  47. Mr. Everything says:

    Is anyone mentioning Nnamdi as a FS?

    • Mr. Everything says:

      Nnamdi played FS in 41 games at Cal, apparently.

      • Grimey9er says:

        I don’t think that is correct. Where did you see that? I grew up in Berkeley and pay pretty close attention to Cal athletics. I remember him as a corner.

    • Grimey9er says:

      You need contact courage to play FS. Namdi is lacking there.

      BTW nice call on Dorsey a while back.

  48. Mood_Indigo says:

    Fun to look back to 2008 when Niners got Justin Smith:
    http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/49ers/archives/010903.html
    “So if Smith’s so great, how come the Bengals didn’t put up more of a fight to retain him? One reason may be the Bengals’ reluctance to pay any player a huge salary like the 49ers are poised to do for Smith. Another is that Cincinnati is turning to a more traditional 3-4 defense, one in which the ends are huge men approaching 300 pounds in weight. Smith, at around 275 pounds, simply wouldn’t have fit their plans.”

  49. Jack Hammer says:

    Dorsey’s deal is for 2 years.

  50. Big niner says:

    Avril to the Seahawks. Man this division just got a lot harder. we shouldn’t overreact but man! How do we counter something like that? they just got a pass rusher in his prime to add to the monster defense. I am nervous I have to admit. What moves can we make to strengthen our defense?

    • Razoreater says:

      Our Offensive Line will be able to handle Stinky Petes’ new toy. Steady there young padawan.

    • claude balls says:

      For the same reasons you should be happy that Baalke isn’t chasing after every shiny object in free agency, you probably shouldn’t worry too much about other teams’ grabbing one of those shiny objects.

      Avril didn’t present the 49ers with any problems when he played with Suh and Fairly. What makes you think he will get better playing with Seattle’s defensive line?

      • Big niner says:

        Add a player like him to a monster defense like theirs and it’s going to present issues. SUH and fairly are over rated. Their DB’s will be adding time to that pass rush. They might not even need to blitz to add pressure.

      • Msclemons67 says:

        I find it strangely comforting that the Seabastards are playing the Redskins/Eagles/Lions game in free agency so far.

      • Scooter_McG says:

        Agreed Clemons. Let them over pay for a handful of players while the 49ers set themselves up for a long run at the top.

    • George says:

      We have played Detroit twice during the Harbaugh era and don’t recall Avril being a problem.

  51. AES says:

    W.Sapp and Poli both feel that the 49ers have really improved themselves with their free agent signings of Boldin and Dorsey.

    Sapp went on to say that he can’t believe that the league has allowed an already strong team like the 49ers become even stronger.

    BTW, huge apologies (to my blog family and to KNBR) for reporting earlier that Vince Young was coming in for a workout with the 49ers.

    I was in a phone convo with a contractor when I (somewhat) heard the KNBR report. I did not hear the part where VY was actually coming to the raiders for a workout.
    I will receive my purification in the morning! (Braveheart)

    • dc9er says:

      What’s sap talking about………smaller rosters and the salary cap are the leagues way of limiting the 49ers.

  52. JP says:

    This signing fills a need, as well as offers some positional versatility. Dorsey should be able to compete with Williams for the starting NT spot as well as provide depth behind Smith and McDonald. I believe the team might try and rotate more on run downs to keep their better interior rushers fresh (Smith and McDonald) for their passing sub package.

    I still think the team drafts more of a “traditional” 3-4 DE to groom as a replacement for Smith. Personally, I’m intrigued by Jesse Williams from Alabama. He has experience at both DE and NT in the Alabama 3-4. He received top notch coaching from the Alabama staff and should be able to contribute right away, whether by his own performance or due to injury.

  53. George says:

    In my opinion, one of the Niners’ keys to success is the instilling of a family atmosphere in their building, in their locker room, and on the field. Here is one of the things Dorsey told Matt Maiocco today:
    “It’s a positive atmosphere. Everybody is working hard and talking to each other. And you can feel it when you walk into the building. It’s like a big family. Everybody is high-fiving each other, talking to each other. It’s a different environment than what I’m used to. I’m excited about it and I’m excited to get going.”

    One of the things he also said that it was Coach Tomsula who met him at the airport last night. About Tomsula, Dorsey said,
    “He has a lot of energy. He’s a great guy. He picked me up at the airport and he was talking 100 mph. We talked about a lot of stuff. I’m excited to get an opportunity work with him.”

    I can’t wait to see what he can bring to the team. Will they use him as just a replacement for IS or RJF. I hope there is more.

  54. dc9er says:

    What do you guys think of the two safeties that the Cardinals let go? I’m guessing they would be too much. I just question the durability of Woodson and Delmas.

  55. truekingcarlos says:

    This is a terrible signing. Goodness. We are losing some key pieces. :(